Why does Neurotherapy work?

Why does Neurotherapy work?

After decades of clinical experience and countless favourable outcome studies, people usually do not doubt that Neurotherapy and Neurofeedback Training are effective ways to combat Functional Brain Disorders. What many struggle to understand is why it works.

Impact of Neurofeedback Therapy

Just an example to prove the point

These are the QEEG Brain-maps of one of our clients. He had been referred to us for a “psychiatric” condition which had rendered him unable to work or do anything else useful. As you can see for yourself, his initial Brain-maps show significant abnormal activity at almost every frequency.

Although not perfect, eleven months later his Brain presented almost normal, he was off all medication, free of symptoms and started a new job. His psychiatrist was gobsmacked and ended up attending workshops and buying a Neurofeedback system to train clients himself. True story.

And another one

This is the original symptom-severity-tracking chart of another client of ours, a 36 year-old mother of two. When she came to see us, she was not only highly anxious and depressed, but also had issues with sleep, concentration, emotional vulnerability and cognitive function. Bit of a mess, really.

In line with her suicidal thoughts, the initial evaluation showed high levels of helplessness/hopelessness. After only 19 sessions of Neurotherapy, her total symptom-severity score had dropped by 86%. A miracle? — Not really.

Neurofeedback Therapy Symptom Improvement
Principles of Neurofeedback Therapy

Who has wired up YOUR Brain?

Brains and computers have in common that • they run on electricity • they have huge numbers of connections • their purpose is handling information and • they don’t always work perfectly — Bummer.

However, there are also substantial differences. Unlike computers, Brains are in a constant process of forming new and severing old connections. “Neurons that fire together wire together. Neurons that fire apart wire apart” is a brief summary of this concept known as Neuroplasticity. So, it was YOU!

Minds changed about plastic Brains

Neuroplasticity has been a topic for popular TV science programs and best-sellings books in the last several years. It proves that the Brain has the ability to acquire, process and store information by forming and strengthening pathways and connections.

It’s puzzling that most children end up walking and talking without any detailed knowledge of Neuroplasticity. Perhaps they are born with the intuitive wisdom that Brains have the capability of learning.

Neurofeedback Therapy uses Neuroplasticity
Neurofeedback Therapy for Grey Matter

Enlargement and Shrinkage

In order to memorise 25,000 streets as well as countless pubs, hospitals, stations and other landmarks, the memory areas of London cab drivers increase substantially as shown in studies with MRI Brain scans.

In contrast, Functional Brain Disorders like PTSD or Chronic Migraine lead to a decrease in Grey matter volume. In simple words: Brain tissue adapts like a muscle: Function shapes structure.

Science confirms: Brains can learn!

While the discovery of Neuroplasticity has scientists all excited, it’s no real surprise for • parents • schoolteachers • university professors • language tutors • sports instructors • behavioural therapists • music coaches and • other educators who deal with teaching, learning and practice in order to gradually improve Brain function.

Allgedly, even beasts can learn and adapt to new challenges, as • animal trainers have now finally revealed to investigators under duress.

Neurofeedback Therapy needs Neuroplasticity
Cats helped discover Neurofeedback Therapy

Cats and Seizures for NASA (1967)

In fact, animals were instrumental in the discovery of the benefits of Neurofeedback Training: For sleep research and with the help of milk and broth, a group of 10 cats were trained to produce a specific type of EEG Brain rhythm, the Sensorimotor Rhythm (SMR).

Later, the 10 EEG-trained and 40 other cats were exposed to toxic rocket fuel fumes in tests for NASA. It turned out that the EEG training had doubled the 10 cats’ resistance against fume-induced epileptic seizures.

Even when Medication fails

Today, EEG-Neurofeedback based Brain training is an effective therapy for human patients with intractable Epilepsy : When meds fail, Neurotherapy can still at least halve the fit rate in 80% of patients. Not too shabby, ey?

Parents of children with intractable epileptic seizures now face a difficult decision: Either • letting doctors cut parts of the Brain out (Neurosurgery) OR • Neurofeedback-based Brain training with EEG-sensors on the head in front of a telly. I reckon this is a no-Brainer!

Neurofeedback Therapy - natural treatment for brains
neurofeedback for mental health

When Children’s Brains struggle

Neurotherapy is probably best known as the right therapy for kids with Attention Disorders, Autism or Learning Difficulties. Sadly, many parents don’t know about it and allow doctors to “treat” these disorders — like diseases — with prescription drugs, of course. That’s all they have.

However, even the pharma-biased AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) has finally recognised Neurofeedback Training as the scientifically best supported therapy for ADD/ADHD.

A Look Inside The Brain

Well-funded universities are publishing an increasing number of studies about fMRI Neurofeedback Therapy, which is an awe-inspiring, yet very costly and uncomfortable way to get a 3-dimensional image of metabolic activity for Brain training.

These days, clinicians don’t have to clutter the garage of their home-based practice with a multi-million dollar fMRI scanner anymore, thanks to LoRETA (= “3-dimensional EEG”) for analysis and therapy.

FMRI Neurofeedback Therapy
Brain Computer Interface

Replacing the Nervous System — some of it

When you and I move our hand and fingers, our Brain talks to our muscles via our peripheral Nervous System. In contrast, the amputee’s Brain send its commands to the bionic hand via a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI).

Apparently, it takes a lot of practice until the Brain can reliably operate this HiTech prosthesis. That’s different in Neurofeedback Therapy where the Brain — also connected via a BCI — is often quite quick to respond to the challenge set-up by the Neurotherapist. And you get to keep your hand!

Neurotherapy works for People with Brains

The US Army utilises Neurotherapy for the rehabilitation of soldiers with PTSD or head injuries, but also with active personnel in conflict zones.

Athletes, surgeons, musicians, stockbrokers and others, whose time is money, use it to optimise their performance. And ageing Brains keep sharper with Neurotherapy.

So, why does Neurotherapy work? — Because it uses the powers that Brains already have anyway. Why wouldn’t ya?

Neurofeedback Therapy for Soldiers, Athletes, Oldies

you’re possibly
asking yourself:

Or perhaps 
you’re dying to
find out …


  • Kolb B et al “Harnessing the power of neuroplasticity for intervention” Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:377
  • Mishra et al “Harnessing the neuroplastic potential of the human brain & the future of cognitive rehabilitation” Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:218
  • Castrén “Neuronal network plasticity and recovery from depression” JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70(9):983-9
  • Cramer et al “Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications” Brain 2011; 134(6): 1591–1609
  • Pascual-Leone et al “Characterizing Brain Cortical Plasticity and Network Dynamics Across the Age-Span in Health and Disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI” Brain Topogr 2011;24(3-4): 302–315
  • Francis et al “Neuroplasticity of the Sensorimotor Cortex during Learning” Neural Plast 2011;2011:310737
  • Apkarian et al “Pain and the brain: Specificity and plasticity of the brain in clinical chronic pain” Pain 2011;152(3):S49–S64
  • Boudreau et al “The role of motor learning and neuroplasticity in designing rehabilitation approaches for musculoskeletal pain disorders” Man Ther 2010;15(5):410-4
  • Weisz et al “Cortical plasticity and changes in tinnitus: treatment options” HNO 2010;58(10):983-9
  • Vance et al “How neuroplasticity and cognitive reserve protect cognitive functioning” J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2010;48(4):23-30
  • Pittenger et al “Stress, depression, and neuroplasticity: a convergence of mechanisms” Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Jan;33(1):88-109
  • Fumagalli et al “Stress during development: Impact on neuroplasticity and relevance to psychopathology” Prog Neurobiol 2007;81(4):197-217
  • Bruel-Jungerman et al “Brain plasticity mechanisms and memory: a party of four” Neuroscientist 2007;13(5):492-505
  • Jang et al “Neurorehabilitation-induced cortical reorganization in brain injury: a 14-month longitudinal follow-up study” NeuroRehabilitation 2007;22(2):117-22
  • Carlson et al “Neural circuitry and neuroplasticity in mood disorders: insights for novel therapeutic targets” NeuroRx 2006;3(1):22-41
  • Esler et al “Sympathetic nervous system neuroplasticity” Hypertension 2006 Feb;47(2):143-4
  • Peled et al “Plasticity imbalance in mental disorders the neuroscience of psychiatry: implications for diagnosis and research” Med Hypotheses 2005;65(5):947-52
  • deCharms et al “Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102(51):18626-31
  • Fuchs et al “Alterations of neuroplasticity in depression: the hippocampus and beyond” Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2004;14;5:S481-90
  • Melzack et al “Central neuroplasticity and pathological pain” Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;933:157-74
  • Jeffery et al “Modifiable neuronal connections: an overview for psychiatrists” Am J Psychiatry 1997;154(2):156-64
  • Zotev et al “Self-regulation of human brain activity using simultaneous real-time fMRI and EEG neurofeedback” Neuroimage 2014;85 Pt 3:985-95
  • Studer et al “Slow cortical potential and theta/beta neurofeedback training in adults: effects on attentional processes and motor system excitability” Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:555
  • Scharnowski et al “Connectivity Changes Underlying Neurofeedback Training of Visual Cortex Activity” PLoS One 2014;9(3):e91090
  • Moll et al “Voluntary enhancement of neural signatures of affiliative emotion using FMRI neurofeedback” PLoS One 2014;9(5):e97343
  • Linden “Neurofeedback and networks of depression” Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2014;16(1):103-12
  • Hinds et al “Neurofeedback using Functional Spectroscopy” Int J Imaging Syst Technol 2014;24(2):138-148
  • Cannon et al “LORETA Neurofeedback in the Precuneus: Operant Conditioning in Basic Mechanisms of Self-Regulation” Clin EEG Neurosci 2014 Mar 3
  • Pineda et al “Neurorehabilitation of social dysfunctions: a model-based neurofeedback approach for low and high-functioning autism” Front Neuroeng 2014;7:29
  • Salari et al “Neurofeedback training of gamma band oscillations improves perceptual processing” Exp Brain Res 2014 Jul 4. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Pineda et al “Neurorehabilitation of social dysfunctions: a model-based neurofeedback approach for low and high-functioning autism” Front Neuroeng 2014;7:29
  • Astrand et al “Selective visual attention to drive cognitive brain-machine interfaces: from concepts to neurofeedback and rehabilitation applications” Front Syst Neurosci 2014;8:144
  • Holtmann M et al “Neurofeedback in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)–a controlled multicenter study of a non-pharmacological treatment approach” BMC Pediatr 2014;14:202
  • Ros et al “Mind over chatter: plastic up-regulation of the fMRI salience network directly after EEG neurofeedback” Neuroimage 2013;65:324-35
  • Haller et al “Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain functional networks through neurofeedback” Neuroimage 2013;81:243-52
  • May et al “Neurofeedback and traumatic brain injury: a literature review” Ann Clin Psychiatry 2013;25(4):289-96
  • Sulzer et al “Neurofeedback-mediated self-regulation of the dopaminergic midbrain” Neuroimage 2013;83:817-25
  • Scheinost et al “Orbitofrontal cortex neurofeedback produces lasting changes in contamination anxiety and resting-state connectivity” Transl Psychiatry 2013;3:e250
  • Lawrence et al “Self-regulation of the anterior insula: Reinforcement learning using real-time fMRI neurofeedback” Neuroimage 2013;88C:113-124
  • Zotev et al “Prefrontal control of the amygdala during real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of emotion regulation” PLoS One 2013;8(11):e79184
  • Bagdasaryan et al “Experiencing your brain: neurofeedback as a new bridge between neuroscience and phenomenology” Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:680
  • Van De Ville et al “Recovery of the default mode network after demanding neurofeedback training occurs in spatio-temporally segregated subnetworks” Neuroimage 2012 Dec;63(4):1775-81
  • Caria et al ”Real-time fMRI: a tool for local brain regulation” Neuroscientist. 2012;18(5):487-501
  • Zotev et al “Self-regulation of amygdala activation using real-time FMRI neurofeedback” PLoS One 2011;6(9):e24522
  • Gevensleben et al “Distinct EEG effects related to neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial” Int J Psychophysiol 2009;74(2):149-57
  • Gruzelier et al “Validating the efficacy of neurofeedback for optimising performance” Prog Brain Res 2006;159:421-31